|
The
horn sounds and you immediately begin hearing those
dreaded four-letter words. As you acknowledge the final
score and head off the court, you hear the words again
and again. One of the coaches says them to you. A few
players glance your way and mumble them. Several fans
shout them out as you pass by. Worse yet, as
you approach the tunnel to the locker room and join
your partners, one of them looks you straight in the
eye and says them. Your partner? Yes, even your partner.
You cringe, but refrain from repeating them to your
partners or anyone else. You know better. "Good
game," they all say. "Good game."
"I used to hear
that all the time when I started officiating,"
says George Arredondo, a Pac-10 basketball referee and
the high school basketball assignor in the San Gabriel
Valley Unit in Whittier, Calif. "I figured I must
be a pretty good referee because all I ever heard was
'good game.'" Today, Arredondo calls "good
game-itis" a disease that plagues officials in
all sports. It's a disease that keeps average officials
average. And the cure? The postgame conference.
"It's alarming to me how young officials will
hear that horn or that gun and they're gone, off to
a bar or a pizza place," says Arredondo. "I
see many high school JV officials who not only don't
have postgames, they don't even stay to visit with the
varsity officials, let alone watch the varsity games."
In all sports and at all
levels, there is a great deal of emphasis placed on
the pregame, where officials discuss in detail what
they plan on doing. Preparation for a game is paramount.
That's obvious. However it's equally important, if not
more so, to have a postgame, where officials can discuss
what they actually did. Jeff Murray has called
high school football, basketball and baseball games
in Oklahoma City since the 1980s. He strongly believes
that the postgame is as important as the pregame, but
admits that the temptation to get in the car and go
too often gets the best of officials. "My football
crew has been together for more than six years so sometimes
that comfort level makes it seem like a postgame is
not necessary. Well, I remember an inadvertent whistle
on a play that we booted and we didn't take the time
to discuss it after the game. Sure enough, a few games
later we had the same incident. That won't happen again.
Good postgames will make sure of that."
At the higher levels, according to Jim Daopoulos, an
NFL supervisor of officials, the postgame and subsequent
observer assessments and videotape reviews are part
of a lengthy, mandatory process. But like Murray, Daopoulos
knows that at the lower levels the process is often
overlooked. "And by lower levels I don't
just mean high school. I don't think college is as critical
as it needs to be with the postgame," said Daopoulos,
who worked the Ohio Valley and Southeast conferences
before an 11-year career on NFL fields. "Except
at the professional level, officials are not held as
accountable as they need to be. Good game-itis? Absolutely
a problem. I see it all the time. I even hear high school
and college observers say it."
USSF National Instructor
Holly Hollingsworth of St. Louis agrees that a good
postgame is the cure and feels that a relaxed approach
is the best medicine. "At the professional and
many of the college level soccer games, an assessor
is assigned to evaluate the performance of the officials.
In many cases, this results in a formal postgame discussion
rather than a give-and-take discussion that may lead
to a more productive learning experience for a young
official. I like the assessor who functions as a member
of the officiating crew, rather than an expert consultant,
and can stimulate a give-and-take discussion. Then everyone,
including the assessor, learns from the postgame discussion."
In his postgame after a college basketball game
in Los Angeles, Arredondo started informally by asking
his partners, "What two things did we do well tonight
and what two things could we have done better?"
Monte Murray, who has moved from the high school level
to the collegiate level from within the San Gabriel
Valley unit, was quick to become introspective.
"There was a short span there in the second
half when the tempo picked up and I got caught up in
it and lost focus," he said in a concerned but
still self-assured manner. "When that
happens, make a point to slow yourself down," advised
Arredondo. "Take a few seconds longer before you
administer an inbounds. Give yourself a chance to regain
control." The junior referee listened
carefully and nodded. "If you don't take
the time to review your game with your partners and
carefully assess each of your efforts, then you're missing
the chance to really improve," says Arrendondo.
"In a postgame, we're forced to analyze our performance
and be analyzed, right there, right at the moment. The
problem is that too many officials get hurt because
they take it personally, not professionally. What has
made Monte successful is that he doesn't take things
personally. He understands that when you open yourself
up and are willing to fail, you succeed. That happens
in a postgame. Confidence and competence come by postgaming."
Hollingsworth likely would praise Arredondo for
taking the initiative in his postgame. "Young officials
probably would like to be invited to join in a postgame
but are uneasy about soliciting an invite. The more
experienced officials need to extend the invitation;
maybe as part of the pregame or as part of the travel
planning." "Any kind of postgame
evaluation is necessary to help you improve," Daopoulos
affirms. "It's just important to communicate."
And once the disease is cured, what do you say
to your partners when you leave the court or the field?
"Great working with you," suggests Arredondo.
"Now let's have a postgame." (Rich
Winograd is a freelance writer from Thousand Oaks, Calif.
He officiates high school basketball.) |